<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discuss Ancestry, Health and Genetics &#8211; deCODEme Forum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.decodeyou.com/discuss-ancestry-health-and-genetics-decodeme-forum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.decodeyou.com/discuss-ancestry-health-and-genetics-decodeme-forum/</link>
	<description>Your Ancestry, Health and Genetic Testing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 04:34:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thaddeus Rial</title>
		<link>http://www.decodeyou.com/discuss-ancestry-health-and-genetics-decodeme-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator>Thaddeus Rial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 04:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decodeyou.com/?p=809#comment-1610</guid>
		<description>Good blog post. Hopefully high blood pressure becomes a more popular focus point to people as they get older.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good blog post. Hopefully high blood pressure becomes a more popular focus point to people as they get older.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: littlemama</title>
		<link>http://www.decodeyou.com/discuss-ancestry-health-and-genetics-decodeme-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-1359</link>
		<dc:creator>littlemama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decodeyou.com/?p=809#comment-1359</guid>
		<description>The results of the &quot;ancestral origins&quot; indicates an African contribution that&#039;s pretty high (9%). I have had a number of genetic analysis done by more than one company and NO ONE has shown any significant contribution from Africa (and by African I&#039;m assuming you mean sub-Saharan African and not Northern African).  Every test I&#039;ve done (including 23andme) indicates &lt;1% (noise). We know our relatives very well and there is no sub-Saharan African in our family tree going back at least 150 years that is known.  It&#039;s all European and American Indian. Either your sample populations include blacks with European blood (thus resulting in the questionable similarity) or the scientific analysis you&#039;re using is erroneous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The results of the &#8220;ancestral origins&#8221; indicates an African contribution that&#8217;s pretty high (9%). I have had a number of genetic analysis done by more than one company and NO ONE has shown any significant contribution from Africa (and by African I&#8217;m assuming you mean sub-Saharan African and not Northern African).  Every test I&#8217;ve done (including 23andme) indicates &lt;1% (noise). We know our relatives very well and there is no sub-Saharan African in our family tree going back at least 150 years that is known.  It&#039;s all European and American Indian. Either your sample populations include blacks with European blood (thus resulting in the questionable similarity) or the scientific analysis you&#039;re using is erroneous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
