We have just made some updates to the deCODEme ancestry service. Now you have more power and flexibility when you compare your genome with that of friends or individuals from different populations around the world.

Your genome can be viewed as a mosaic or tapestry made up of fragments of chromosomes from your ancestors. Fragments of chromosomes inherited from very recent ancestors, say grandparents, are expected to be large – typically tens of millions of nucleotides in size. As ancestors become more ancient, then the size of the chromosome fragments inherited from them become smaller – down to a few thousand or hundred nucleotides for ancestors born thousands of years ago.

Our new and improved genome comparison tool enables to you compare your genome with another individual in order to determine which chromosome fragments you share and to see how much of your genome is shared. The fascinating thing about this analysis is that each shared fragment represents a common ancestor. The number of shared fragments and their size reflects the number of common ancestors and how far back in time they are found. In other words, you can see how closely you are related.

When genomes are compared, your chromosomes are broken down into fragments of a particular size and sharing is evaluated for each fragment. Before the fragment size was fixed at 1 million nucleotides. Now you can change the size of fragments that are compared, from a minimum of 250 thousand nucleotides (250Kb) to a maximum of 20 million nucleotides (20Mb). The minimum fragment size will reveal shared chromosome fragments from common ancestors going back thousands of years. The maximum fragment size will reveal only shared chromosome fragments from very recent common ancestors – i.e. going back only a few generations. Setting the fragment size thus lets you select how far back in time you want to hunt for common ancestors.

This image shows results of a comparison between an Icelander and an Orkney Islander using a fragment size of 3Mb. The brown lines are shared fragments, inherited from common ancestors from more than 1000 years ago!

The National Human Genome Research Institute catalog can now be accessed through your deCODEme account

Through your deCODEme account (or the demo account if you are not yet a deCODEme customer) you can access a catalog of published Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) that has been compiled by the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI).

This feature allows you to gain a quick overview of where research on common traits has been showing associations with single nucleotide genetic variations (SNPs).  Users can easily select a disease or trait from a list and a feature track with the corresponding SNPs from the catalog will show up in our Genome Browser.

Many of the associations in the GWAS catalog compiled in August 2009 are included in our Health Watch feature. There are also numerous other associations that our scientists have not included, as they do not fulfill the criteria we set for inclusion in our Health Watch.

The GWAS catalog is presented (see here) simply as it appears on the NHGRI web site and has not been reviewed by deCODE’s scientists. The catalog is provided primarily for educational purposes – for the curious George who wants to look at genome-wide association study results in the context of other information that we provide in our Genome Browser.

deCODEme DNA test now includes Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer is the eighth most common cancer in women. Based on ovarian cancer statistics in the U.S., it is expected that 1.4% of women born today will be diagnosed with cancer of the ovary at some point during their lifetime. This represents the lifetime risk of ovarian cancer and means that 1 out of every 71 women will be diagnosed with this disease during their lifetime. deCODEme Complete Scan now includes risk calculation for Ovarian Cancer.

Genetics is a major risk factor for ovarian cancer

Although many environmental and lifestyle factors affect the risk of ovarian cancer, the single greatest known risk factor is a family history of the disease. This indicates that genetics is a major risk factor. Scientists already know that variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes significantly increase a woman’s chances of developing ovarian cancer. However, these variants are rare and account for less than 5% of all ovarian cancers. Recently, scientists have discovered a common variant on chromosome 9 that can increase a woman’s risk of developing the most common type of ovarian cancer (epithelial cancer). This variant is found in approximately 70% of women of European descent.

Iceland was mainly settled by Scandinavian men and women from Irealand and Scotland

In a paper published today scientists at deCODE genetics present the results of the largest study of ancient DNA from a single population ever undertaken. Analyzing mitochondrial DNA, which is passed from mother to offspring, from 68 skeletal remains from approximately 1000 years ago, the study provides the most detailed look to date at how a contemporary population differs from that of its ancestors. The results confirm previous deCODE work that used genetics to test the history of Iceland as recorded in the sagas.

Audio link:  Dr. Kari Stefansson interviewed on BBC WORLD. BBC

These studies demonstrated that the country seems indeed to have been settled by men from Scandinavia – the vikings – but that the majority of the original female inhabitants were from the coastal regions of Scotland and Ireland, areas that regularly suffered raids by vikings in the years around the settlement of Iceland 1100 years ago.

Perhaps the most remarkable finding of the study published today is that the gene pool of contemporary Icelanders appears to have evolved rapidly over the intervening thousand years. As a result, the original female settlers are genetically more closely related to the present day populations of Scotland, Ireland and Scandinavia, as well as those of northwestern Europe and even southwestern Europe, than they are to present day Icelanders. This is an important demonstration of a phenomenon known as ‘genetic drift.’ In essence, in any population certain individuals will have more offspring and, by chance and in this case over the course of 35 generations, many more descendants than others. And as a result, particularly in a small population, the genetic variety of the original population can decrease and change over time. In this study only mitochondrial DNA was studied, but the same phenomenon applies to the Y chromosome, which is passed from fathers to sons, and to any other part of the genome. The paper, ‘Sequences from first settlers reveal rapid evolution in Icelandic mtDNA pool,’ is published today in the open-access journal PLOS Genetics.

“This study is a major contribution to the use of ancient DNA studies in tracing the history not just of single populations, but of our species and how we spread from Africa to every corner of the globe. It is the first such study to be large enough to permit meaningful statistical methods to be applied to ancient DNA. We very much hope this will aid and encourage others to follow with large studies in other parts of the world. In this field, as in the genetics of common diseases, we are pleased and proud to be able to put the knowledge we gain in Iceland to work for the benefit of people everywhere,” said Kari Stefansson, CEO of deCODE.

Scientists at deCODE genetics Genetic Service Facility lab in Iceland

The number of companies offering genetic tests to the public is large and growing. But there are vast and very real differences in the quality, purpose and price of testing services out there. So how do you tell the difference between them? And how do you decide which to use?

Knowing what you want

First and foremost, you need to think about what sort of information you hope to gain from your genome and how accurate you want the results to be. Are you taking the test only for fun, perhaps hoping to talk about your results on Facebook? Or are you interested in using it to protect or improve your health, perhaps working with a doctor? And do you want your information to be kept strictly private so that you are in full control of those with whom you share it, or are you comfortable with others being able to access it and use it?

At deCODE, we have studied the genomes of hundreds of thousands of people over the past twelve years. Our goal has been to discover what variations in the human genome give some people higher or lower than average likelihood of developing many of the most common diseases in our society. We use that information to develop products like genetic tests that can help people to stay as healthy as possible for as long as possible. From day one that’s been our bread and butter – it’s not an idea that occurred to us last week or even last year.

And with that experience, and having worked with so many people, there are a few basic things that we think you should look for in any genetic testing service. These are fundamental characteristics that we demand of ourselves in all of our discovery work, and we think you should settle for nothing less.

Buyer’s checklist

In any field, in order to offer services to the public you have to be able to stand behind the quality of your product. In genetic testing, the basis of any test worth paying for is good science: large-scale studies that establish and then replicate in independent groups links between specific markers in the genome and specific traits, such as diseases. Making those links requires gathering large sets of very high quality, consistent data. It requires teams of doctors, geneticists and other scientists, as well as certified DNA analysis laboratories, statistical tools and computing power and software to accurately analyze the datasets. If you can do all this under the strictest data and privacy protection protocols in the world, you will reward the participation of your research subjects with peace of mind they deserve.

That’s just for starters. In order to offer a test, you need to be give your customers the same certified quality of DNA analysis, as well as the ability to accurately interpret what the findings of large studies mean for disease risk. In short, you need all the same capabilities and expertise as for research, but focused on accurately and securely delivering results to individuals.

The gold standard

These are the standards that lie behind deCODEme and all our diagnostic tests. We offer the best science, usually our own, as our scientists lead the world in finding genetic risk factors for common diseases. Where we do use discoveries made by others, our scientists have validated the findings according to our own rigorous criteria. We have our own CLIA-certified DNA analysis laboratory, one of the largest of its kind in the world, and do our own quality control. We share your results with no one but those you specifically request. We offer our customers the ability to check whether they carry validated risk factors for dozens of diseases, and update their profiles rapidly and regularly as new discoveries are made. This isn’t trivial stuff, and our prices reflect the quality of the products we offer.

Don’t just take our word for it: the value of deCODE tests is reflected most clearly in the stories of customers like you. On this blog you can read about what they have to say about how they are using their results to better look after their own health.

Your genome, your choice

This is a high bar, and one that few others will pass. Can you find cheaper services out there? Yes. Are there dot-com storefronts that outsource the science and the analysis of your genome? Yes. That are focused less on quality and more on website bells-and-whistles for using your genome for social networking? Yes again.

But your genome is yours, and we think you have a right to choose the best for yourself if that’s what you want. At deCODE we are not offering cut-rate services, outsourcing the analysis of your genome, or cutting corners on privacy protection. We give you a portal into the best and latest in genetics, offering the highest quality services available for those who want to know how the latest breakthroughs in human genetics can be used to improve their health and healthcare. If that’s you, we encourage you to check how other services stack up to deCODE – and we look forward to hearing from you!

Urinary bladder cancer is something many people have never heard of. But it is the sixth most common form of cancer in the United States, and its environmental risk factors include exposure to toxic chemicals, including some used in industrial processing as well as cigarette smoke. Genetic factors also play a role and may help to elucidate how bladder cancer starts and develops.

Today, deCODE’s cancer group and colleagues at Radboud University in the Netherlands report the discovery of two single letter variants (commonly referred to as SNPs) in the human genome that confer increased risk of bladder cancer. Both are common, and 20 percent of people of European descent carry two copies of the highest impact SNP, located on chromosome 8q24. That puts them at about 50 percent higher likelihood of developing bladder cancer than people who do not carry the variant.

Since risk screening for bladder cancer has been largely confined to those with known exposure to carcinogenic substances, the ability to test for these variants may useful particularly for those know to have other risk factors. As with all our discoveries, we have worked hard to publish them and to secure intellectual property rights to enable us to put these findings straight to use. deCODE has integrated these findings into deCODEme, so that individuals and their doctors can utilize these findings if it is warranted.

Another intriguing aspect of the paper published today in Nature Genetics is that over the past year deCODE and others have linked SNPs on the same stretch of chromosome 8 to risk of prostate, breast and colorectal cancer. We are looking into what common processes may be triggered or affected by these variants, since a common mechanism might be able to tell us something about the underlying molecular causes of cancer in general.

Official deCODE Genetics Press Release:

Contacts:
Edward Farmer Gisli Arnason
+1 646 417 4555 +354 570 1825
edward.farmer@decode.is gisli.arnason@decode.is

deCODE and Radboud University Discover Common Variants in the Human Genome Conferring Risk of Bladder Cancer

Detection may be used to complement and target screening for the disease; findings will be integrated into the deCODEme™ personal genome scan.

Reykjavik, ICELAND, September 14, 2008 – Scientists at deCODE genetics (Nasdaq:DCGN) and colleagues at Radboud University Medical Center in the Netherlands today report the discovery of two common single-letter variants in the human genome (SNPs) that confer increased risk of urinary bladder cancer. Approximately 20% of people of European descent carry two copies of the first variant, a version of a SNP on chromosome 8q24, putting them at a 50% higher risk of developing bladder cancer than those without the variant. Individuals who carry two copies of a common version of another SNP on chromosome 3 were found to be at a 40% higher risk of the disease than non-carriers. These are the best-replicated genetic variants ever linked to bladder cancer risk, and the study analysed genotypic data from more than 40,000 patients and controls from Iceland, the Netherlands and eight other European countries. The paper, entitled ‘Sequence variant on 8q24 confers susceptibility to urinary bladder cancer,’ will appear today in the online edition of Nature Genetics at www.nature.com/ng.

“In all cancers, the ability to identify individuals at high risk, screening them intensively and intervening early, is the key to improving prevention and outcomes. We expect that the detection of these and other risk variants will soon be employed to complement the assessment of standard risk factors for bladder cancer. As with all of our discovery work, we seek to publish our findings and establish a solid intellectual property position in order to bring these swiftly into the healthcare arena, and have already folded today’s findings into our deCODEme™ personal genome analysis service. At the same time, we are working to identify the common thread of variants we and others have discovered on chromosome 8q24 that confer risk of several forms of cancer, including prostate, breast, colorectal and now bladder. If a common molecular mechanism exists, it could provide an important insight into oncogenesis more broadly,” said Kari Stefansson, CEO of deCODE.

For a more detailed discussion of today’s findings you can watch a video discussion between Dr. Stefansson and Dr. Simon Stacey on our blog, at www.decodeyou.com.

Urinary bladder cancer is the sixth most common type of cancer in the United States. It is estimated that 68,810 individuals will be diagnosed with bladder cancer in the United States during 2008 and that 14,100 people will die of the disease. Bladder cancer has been linked to exposure to various types of toxic substances such as cigarette smoke and industrial chemicals. Although it has been known for some time that genetic factors also play a significant role, identifying validated genetic risk variants had been problematic. Incidence of bladder cancer varies considerably between ethnicities, and as the risk factors reported here were discovered by analysing DNA from groups of European descent, it is our hope that the publication of these findings will contribute to the swift analysis of the impact of these variants in cohorts of other continental ancestries.

The authors wish to thank the thousands of patients and control subjects who participated in this study, and acknowledge the assistance of national cancer registries that worked to identify potential participants. Data and sample collection in Iceland and the Netherlands was funded in part by European commission grants LSHC-CT-2005-018827 and LSHM-CT-2004-005166.

About deCODE
deCODE is a biopharmaceutical company applying its discoveries in human genetics to the development of diagnostics and drugs for common diseases. deCODE is a global leader in gene discovery — our population approach and resources have enabled us to isolate key genes contributing to major public health challenges from cardiovascular disease to cancer, genes that are providing us with drug targets rooted in the basic biology of disease. Through its CLIA-registered laboratory, deCODE is offering a growing range of DNA-based tests for gauging risk and empowering prevention of common diseases, including deCODE T2™ for type 2 diabetes; deCODE AF™ for atrial fibrillation and stroke; deCODE MI™ for heart attack; deCODE ProCa™ for prostate cancer; and deCODE Glaucoma™ for a major type of glaucoma. deCODE is delivering on the promise of the new genetics.SM Visit us on the web at www.decode.com; on our diagnostics site at www.decodediagnostics.com; for our pioneering personal genome analysis service, at www.decodeme.com; and on our blog at www.decodeyou.com.

Any statements contained in this presentation that relate to future plans, events or performance are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, and the timing of events, to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among others, those relating to our ability to obtain financing and to form collaborative relationships, uncertainty regarding potential future deterioration in the market for auction rate securities which could result in additional permanent impairment charges, our ability to develop and market diagnostic products, the level of third party reimbursement for our products, risks related to preclinical and clinical development of pharmaceutical products, including the identification of compounds and the completion of clinical trials, the effect of government regulation and the regulatory approval processes, market acceptance, our ability to obtain and protect intellectual property rights for our products, dependence on collaborative relationships, the effect of competitive products, industry trends and other risks identified in deCODE’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, without limitation, the risk factors identified in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and any updates to those risk factors filed from time to time in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or Current Reports on Form 8-K. deCODE undertakes no obligation to update or alter these forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Here are a few thoughts on Nic Fleming’s piece on personal genome scans, of which one was our own, deCODEme:

Our genomes are all remarkably similar. And so it is the differences that are most interesting and important, and that make us who we are.

The same can be said of genetic testing services. We at deCODE were not at all surprised that Mr. Fleming found that he got some varying results from the three genome scans that he tried. Indeed we would be surprised (and more than a little dismayed) if he hadn’t. Analyzing the genome – accurately detecting which genetic markers individuals have at specific points in the genome, and correlating these variations with risk of a range of common diseases – has been our bread and butter for well over a decade. With the analysis of hundreds of thousands of genomes under our belt, we can say with some authority that it is not a trivial business. We would never ourselves rely on consultants to tell us what variants to look for, what they mean, or to oversee the genotypic analysis itself. And we certainly would not offer such treatment to doctors or members of the public.

That said, it would be a strange logic that therefore suggests that the whole field, or the very well validated science that now exists linking specific markers to risk of common diseases, should be lumped in together as though all are nothing but dot-com storefronts selling DNA analysis today where they might have been selling sofas last year. deCODEme or our diagnostic tests, for example, only detect risk variants that meet exacting criteria: they must have been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and replicated in large cohorts from several populations. Many genetic risk factors for common diseases have passed this high bar, and have thus been as well validated, as most non-genetic risk factors were when they were first brought into clinical use. As Mr. Fleming notes, there are physicians who are incorporating genetic risk factors into their clinical practice and with some important successes that individuals have been willing to share with the world. (We are posting some of these stories on this blog and on the personal stories page of deCODEme).

So, as suggested by Mr. Fleming’s piece and by Lord Taverne and others he interviewed, it is of pressing importance to establish high scientific and technical standards and regulations for such tests. We therefore hope that the Human Genetics Commission, and other oversight bodies in Europe, the US, and elsewhere will continue to scrutinize how best to provide an effective sheriff for this new territory. Doing so will enable individuals and the healthcare system to take full benefit from the potential of this new technology, while protecting the public from unscrupulous cowboys. At the least – since some people like cavorting with fun-loving bandit types – everyone would know who was who.

Edward Farmer
Chief Communications Officer
deCODE genetics